Accounting Consequences of Legal Business Organization



If you are starting a business, one of the first decisions to make is the legal structure of the business. This decision will impact your taxes, liability, and control over the business over its life. Considerations to take into consideration are:

How large do you expect the business be? What level of personal liability are you comfortable with? Do you anticipate much liability in the daily operations of the business? How much revenue do you project? How comfortable are you with strict organizational structures? How do the owner(s) plan to take profits out of the business?

But this decision should not be made in a vacuum. Consult your accountant and attorney for advice before making a final decision. They can help guide you through the implications of how you organize your business. They are also the experts in any relevant state and federal laws.

There are three major categories of legal business structures with variations on each. Here are some of the most common legal structures with the pluses and minuses of each.

Sole Proprietorships

Most small businesses start out as a sole proprietorship. This is when there is only one owner who is also responsible for the day-to-day operation of the business. The owner controls all the assets of the business and takes on all the liability of the business operations. Profits and losses are reported directly on the owner’s personal income taxes. In effect, the business and the owner are the same entity legally.

Pluses of Sole Proprietorships

Easiest form of business to set up and dissolve. Single owner has complete control over the business. All profits and can be re-invested in the business or it can be used by the owner.

Minuses of Sole Proprietorships

Owner has full liability for business operations. This includes all debts or lawsuits against the business. The owner’s entire personal assets are at risk. It is harder to raise capital from commercial sources with a management team of one. Employee benefits can not be deducted from the business’ income. This includes the owners health insurance.

Variation of Sole Proprietorships

There is only one type of sole proprietorship.

Partnerships

Similar to a sole proprietorship except that this entity includes two or more people who share ownership of the business. The day-to-day management of the business may or may not be divided among the partners. Once again the law looks on the owners and the business as a single entity. An operating agreement should be drawn up by a lawyer and signed by all partners governing how the ownership is divided, profits will be distributed, new partners added, and the business dissolved. The cost for a lawyer to write up a good operating agreement is far less than the litigation that invariable will arise over the life a business. It is the same issues as with a divorce over the property.

Pluses of Partnerships

They are still easy to establish but you should have a professionally done operating agreement. Liability is spread over several owners. All profits can be re-invested or flow directly to the owners. It is easier to get capital from traditional sources including banks.

Minuses of Partnerships

All the partners are liable for the debt and lawsuits of the business. The partners’ personal assets are at risk. Profits and decision making is shared if conflict arises. Employee benefits can not be deducted from the businesses income. This includes health insurance.

Variations of Partnerships

General Partners — Members of the ownership team responsible for day-to-day management, associated liability, and share of profits. Sometimes called an active partners. Limited Partners (LLP) — Members of the ownership team that only have liability up to their investment and generally have limited input into the day-to-day operations of the business. Sometimes called a silent partner.

Corporations

A corporation is registered with the state where the company resides. Legally it is a unique entity from the owners. The taxes are paid by the corporation and it can be sued or enter into contractual agreements. A corporation is owned by shareholders who elect a board of directors to manage the day-to-day business decisions. A lawyer should draw up the ownership agreements.

Pluses of Corporations

Shareholders have limited liability for the corporation’s debts and liabilities. Shareholders can only be held accountable for their investment in the stock of the business. Easier to raise capital through the sale of stock or through commercial means. Employee benefits can be deducted from the corporation’s profits for taxes.

Minuses of Corporations

More difficult to form than a partnership. However, most states now have online options that eliminate the paperwork. Additional regulations and reporting are required from federal, state and local governments. Owners’ income may be subject to double taxation.

Variations of Corporations

S Corporations — An S Corporation is only a tax election. It enables the shareholders to treat the earnings and profits as distributions and have them pass through directly to the owners personal income taxes. However, the owners’ pay must be comparable to what any employee would be paid to do a similar job at another company. The IRS can reclassify the business and the shareholders will be liable for all payroll taxes if all requirements are not met. Limited Liability Company (LLC) — An LLC was designed to provide many of the benefits of both partnerships and corporations. There is limited liability to the owners like a corporation but the flow of profit works like a partnership. The income of the business is reported on the shareholders personal income taxes as income.

Posted in Organizational | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Global Business – Licensing and Franchising



Another approach to international business is licensing. Important point, license agreements entitle one company to produce or market another company’s product or to utilize its technology in return for a royalty or fee. Sounds good with our company. Here’s an example – a U.S. business might obtain the rights to manufacture and sell a Scandinavian skin lotion in the United States, using the Scandinavian formula and packaging design. The U.S. company would be responsible for promoting and distributing the product, and it would pay the Scandinavian company a percentage of its income from sales in exchange for the products rights.

Licensing deals can also work the other way, with the U.S. company acting as the licenser and the overseas company as the licensee. Another important point, the U.S. firm would avoid the shipping costs, trade barriers, and uncertainties associated with trying to enter other markets, but it would still receive a portion of the revenue from overseas sales. Moreover, licensing agreements are not restricted to international business. A company can also license its products or technology to other companies in its domestic market.

Just going to expand a little on franchising. This technique is getting expensive everyday. Franchising is another was to expand into foreign markets. With a franchise agreement, the franchisee obtains the rights to duplicate a specific product or service (ex. restaurant, photocopy shop, or a video rental store). And the company selling the franchise obtains a royalty fee in exchange. Holiday Inn WorldWide has used this approach to reach customers in over 60 countries. The point is that by franchising the operation, a company can minimize the costs and risks of global expansion and bypass certain trade restrictions.

Posted in International Business | Tagged | Leave a comment

Different Leadership Styles in Nursing

A nurse leader, a nurse manager, a nursing unit, or a nurse executive, responsible for the entire patient may be responsible for nursing units. Just select a leadership style, an outstanding nurse leader rather than facing many situations usually is based on the styles uses.

Types

There are two basic leadership styles are free and unfettered. These styles can be further broken down into subcategories. A nurse leader who is an independent Democrat, for example, decides to engage their nurses and allows working independently. Directed an autocrat, on the other hand, without seeking input instructs and supervises the nearby nurses.

Situational leadership

An experienced nurse leader’s leadership style that works best in any situation chooses. For example, he is a Democrat approver his unit when it is time to buy new equipment can act as. Nurses want to arrange the purchase of equipment and then they can use it to freely allow. When there is an emergency code blue on the other hand, is that less experienced nurses for a directive autocrat who unilaterally instructs while he may be closely supervise their work.

Considerations

A nurse leader based on his age and experience level of nurses can change their leadership style. Veterans, born before 1943 as nurses, to share their hard earned expertise, but do not want or need close supervision. On the other hand, smaller and less experienced nurses Generation Y with plenty of guidance and feedback may benefit from surveillance.

Skills

When graduating from a school nurse and RN License earns, it usually leads to basic applied skills to direct patient care. As he advances to charge nurse, nurse manager and, eventually, the nurse executive, she will need to learn more about leadership. There are colleges and universities, vocational education courses are available through companies and hospitals. It is important for a nurse for advice and more senior nurse leaders who provide honest feedback about your leadership style can consult with.

Significance

Nursing management of a shared governance model that affect their behaviour toward the nurses involved in decisions has trended. In that model, a nurse manager uses a permissive democrat style, her nurses clinical decision-making activity and monitor their results in the patient encouraged to participate. Nurse Executive, in turn, uses the same style with the nursing staff nurses represented by the establishment of councils.

Posted in Leadership | Leave a comment